My friend showed me a letter where he called me something like a liberal wolf in socialist sheep’s clothing and accused me of being aligned with Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., and George Kennan in a plot to discredit William Appleman Williams. I soon discovered from a mutual friend that he had gotten an advance copy from the New York Times for the express purpose of blasting it. My doctoral dissertation was soon to be published as a book, and Radosh began denouncing it. He writes, for example, that although I had introduced evidence that Truman did not know about Venona, West says it is bogus and even if it was not, Truman 'could have demanded that code breakers work faster and harder.' Really? Does Reeves even know how difficult a job these skilled people had, and how hard they actually worked around the clock to break the Soviet codes?.I first met author Ronald Radosh nearly 30 years ago at a convention of historians when he was supposedly on the left. Next, Reeves makes statements that are more than comical. What Reeves actually means is that I do not endorse West's analysis, methodology, or findings - which is something other than what he accuses me and Klehr and Haynes of. I have never shied away from clearly stating the implication and meaning of the evidence I have uncovered. If you read any of the scores of articles I have written in the past few years about Howard Zinn, Oliver Stone, or the Rosenbergs, that becomes more than clear. Reeves argues that while he respects and knows my work and that of Haynes and Klehr, I was 'nitpicking' her facts, by pointing to 'contradictory facts.' Reeves writes that we are all 'excellent researchers and writers,' yet somehow we 'are all restricted by their profession not to dramatize their findings,' connect the dots, and 'come to conclusions.' This is more than ridiculous. Information that contradicts their fiercely held view is denied, explained-away, or, most often, simply ignored.' it is as if they wear special glasses that can only see what conforms to their worldview. Their method, particularly that engaged in by Diana West, is one that my colleagues John Earl Haynes and Harvey Klehr write is that of intellectual ''true believers,' ideological zealots who are mentally incapable of accepting or processing information that undermines their historical worldview. Writing on this website, Bernie Reeves attempts an evaluation of both Diana West's book and my own critique of it. Truman and the Founding of Israel, and Spain Betrayed: The Soviet Union in the Spanish Civil War. He is author or co-author of over fifteen books, including The Rosenberg File, A Safe Haven: Harry S. Ronald Radosh is an Adjunct Fellow at the Hudson Institute and a columnist for PJ Media.

Spain Betrayed by Ronald Radosh